Mondays with Mike: When were those good old days?

March 7, 2016 • Posted in Mike Knezovich, Mondays with Mike, politics, Uncategorized by

I grew up in a household where politics—paying attention to them, thinking about them, and forming reasoned positions—was not sport, it was an obligation as a citizen. My sister volunteered—at the age of 16—for Robert F. Kennedy’s presidential campaign, and after enduring the heartbreak of seeing her candidate murdered, she ended up working for Sen. Eugene McCarthy (sort of the Bernie Sanders of his day, for you millennials out there).

My mother and sister fought like cats and dogs about, well, everything—for pretty much, well—their entire lives. Back then our mother was happy that her daughter cared, but mom had lived a lot longer—which made her wiser and more realistic from one point of view, or lacking ideals and too crusty to get it, from another.

(For the record, if I could have voted, it would have been Humphrey. I was already suspicious of politicians tilting at windmills. We all suspected my father may have voted for Nixon, but that he never said so for fear of his life. But in fairness he was also the kind of guy who would’ve held his vote close to his vest regardless.)

Which brings me to this: We’re in the midst of a crazy angry election season and crazy angry times. And we tend always to think our time is unprecedented in the degree of craziness and tumultuousness. But I’m here to say: It’s not so.

George C. Wallace--I have no idea how long his fingers are.

George C. Wallace–hard to tell how long his fingers were.

We didn’t have Donald Trump back in 1968. We did have George Wallace, though, and he did run in the presidential election, getting 14 percent of the vote on a platform that makes the Donald’s rants seem kind of tame. Think about that. And there was Strom Thurmond, a bald-faced racist who served for 48 years as Senator—largely because he was a bald-faced racist.

1968 was the birth of the hateful Southern Strategy that served the Republican Party well for decades (but now also goes a long way toward splainin’ how the party has painted itself into its current corner).

We have Iraq, Afghanistan, ISIS and terrorism now. Back then it was the Cold War, near misses on nuclear war catastrophes, and a little strategy we called “containment,” which led to a little war that cost nearly 60,000 Americans their lives. Not to mention more than 200,000 South Vietnamese soldiers, and well over a million North Vietnamese and Viet Cong soldiers—not counting enormous civilian deaths owed to bombing. (I’m leaving out Laos and Cambodia.)

Oh, and RFK and King were killed, there were massive race riots, cities burning and campus shutdowns.

Cue The Temptations’ Ball of Confusion.

I’m not saying everything’s better. What I know without doubt is, our Ball of Confusion survived, and by my reckoning a lot really is better. The struggle continues. This too, shall pass,

And no matter how the election goes, I ain’t moving anywhere.

Mel Theobald On March 7, 2016 at 8:13 pm

In the words of that great philosopher Yogi Berra, “It ain’t over ’til it’s over!” Mike, your story made me feel like I was sitting in the room with your mother and sister. History is real, it may be old, but it is real and you have a way of putting it in perspective and keeping it personal. Like you, I’m not going anywhere. Thanks for bringing a smidgen of sanity to this quadrennial party we call politics.

Mike On March 8, 2016 at 12:04 pm

Thanks for reading, Mel.

Benita Black On March 8, 2016 at 9:03 am

Yep, remember the bad old days very well. I, like your sister, was “Clean for Gene.” I am not quite as rosy as you are about “things being better” (guess we have to specify which “things,” at which point we likely agree); in fact, I think things have never been worse, in terms of political discourse and the mood of the country. And I’m not likely to go anywhere either, but damn if I wouldn’t love my little island off the coast of the US to secede.

Mike On March 8, 2016 at 12:07 pm

Well, this post was a little pep talk to myself–but it was worth recalling those times. I think the discourse has been debased, so we agree there for sure. We have socialist and a woman on one side, and, though they’re not my cup of tea, we have two candidates of Hispanic descent on the other. And they’re fighting to succeed a black president. So I hold onto what I can:)

Benita Black On March 8, 2016 at 3:15 pm

I just mentioned last night that my niece, who will be 13 next week, remembers only having a black president, and a woman running now is no big whoop to her; it’s just the way things are and have “always” been to her and her cohort. So, yes, you are right to give yourself (and by proxy, us) this nice little pep talk. And Opening Day is around the corner, so life is good. 🙂

Mary Rayis On March 8, 2016 at 9:04 am

Thanks for the perspective, Mike. Still, as voters I think we should be very afraid of a Donald Trump presidency. His views threaten to take us back to the days when it was okay to discriminate openly against minorities.

Mike On March 8, 2016 at 12:08 pm

Yeah, we should definitely aim higher, Mary!

Dmarta On March 8, 2016 at 3:18 pm

I worked for McCarthy too but thought of him as old like Bernie. Turns out he was in his 50s. Perspectives change. Diana Marta

Sent from my iPhone

>

Al Hippensteel On March 8, 2016 at 4:55 pm

Mike,
Again, I appreciate your putting things in perspective. Andrew Jackson was a populist and swept into the presidency by the uneducated masses. I don’t know if he was such a great president, however, he, at least, was a tough and successful general. Today, we certainly need someone with more diplomatic skills, I think.

Leave a Response