If you’ve been reading my blog lately, you know I’ve been in Madison the last week touting – and presenting at – the Vision Midwest conference. What you might not know, however, is that my husband was asked to participate in this conference, too. Mike sat on a panel Saturday morning, and I am happy to introduce him here now as a guest blogger to tell you all about it.
Survivors Love Company
by Mike Knezovich
Beth loves a hotel room, if you haven’t figured that out by now. That’s partly for the same reasons lots of us do–a room at a hotel often means a special occasion. For Beth, though, it means a sort of idealized living space. Everything she needs is close and easy to find.
And so it is in our hotel in Madison. Beth arrived here earlier this week. By the time I arrived she’d settled in exactly as she likes to–Hanni’s stuff at a particular point at the foot of the bed, her own bag at another, and so on. I’m happy to fit my stuff around her blueprint, and it works splendidly.
But it hasn’t always worked so well. There was a time when our getaways to hotel rooms would begin rife with tension–and sometimes with a fight and hurt feelings. We’d walk through our door, I’d drop the bags and be giddy with excitement, impatient to head out on an adventure. Beth, meanwhile, would immediately begin acclimating herself to our temporary digs. Hands in front of her, walking slowly–sometimes toward a knee-high end table, or a protruding wall-mounted shelf or…and I couldn’t help myself. I’d say “a little to the left” or “Lookout!” or worse yet, walk over to guide her around trouble. She’d get angry that I didn’t just let her do it her way, and that I’d broken her concentration. I’d get mad that she was mad. I was only trying to help, after all.
Those days, happily, are over. We’ve reached the point where we can talk about things like this–things where blindness requires reasonable accommodation on both our parts. But it wasn’t easy and as I learned at my panel discussion yesterday, it isn’t easy for anyone. The panel was for and about those of us in mixed partnerships–where one is visually impaired and the other is sighted. It was moderated by Chris Quinn, a marriage and family therapist. Quinn wasn’t always a therapist. He was a navy fighter pilot, and then a commerical airliner pilot–the holy grail in aviation–until he began losing his eyesight. He was married at the time, but his marriage eventually ended in divorce. For the past eight years, he’s been in a happy relationship–and his sighted partner was on the panel. Which is all to say, Chris knew his stuff.
I heard some heartachingly familiar stories from my fellow panelists. Betsy had lost her sight to diabetic retinopathy just as Beth had, and she recalled the laborious recovery period after retina surgery. Like Beth, Betsy had been required to lie face down for months. That allowed a gas bubble injected during surgery to rise and press against the retina to prevent the retina from detaching as it healed. Harder still to hear and just as familiar was her story about cleaning the kitchen shortly after losing her sight. She is a determined person and made up her mind to pull her weight around the house, as she always had. But after she finished in the kitchen one day, she heard noises and realized her husband was cleaning up after her.
You might think that was a nice thing. But just after a person loses his or her sight, self-confidence and self-assurance are in short supply. And there was the time she made cinnamon toast for her kids–except she grabbed the chili powder instead of the cinnamon. Her 10 year old hugged her and broke the news. We winced and laughed at the same time.
A couple on the panel–the husband sighted, his spouse gradually losing vision to macular degeneration–told similar stories. In fact, describing himself as a neat freak, he said he and his wife finally talked about it and negotiated a deal: She could cook and bake as much as she wanted–guilt-free–and he could clean up after–guilt-free. There was a couple on the verge of retirement, but their retirement plans had been torpedoed by the husband’s vision loss. They’d been planning for years to live on a lake. Now, he can’t drive anymore, and everything is different. “I’m feeling overwhelmed,” said his spouse.
A woman in the audience explained that as her sight has grown worse, she must enlarge text to the point where she can only see one word at a time. She recalled realizing that without the context of the sentence, she couldn’t understand what she was reading. She said she felt stupid and useless and that she broke down into tears when she told her boyfriend about it. “He just said ‘I don’t think you’re stupid,’ and mostly he just listened.”
The sighted contingency took note–because often, as much as we want to make things right, what we learn is that the very best thing we can do is be there and listen. And our partners have to be willing te tell us this stuff. Another lesson was that as unique as our situations are, none of us are alone. And I hope–and believe–that those who attended who are on the front end of this experience learned that it gets better.
The main lesson I think everyone took away from the panel was you have to find a away to talk about things no matter how uncomfortable.
Great post Mike. Its interesting to hear what its like for sighted partners.
I hate how if your blind, people will sometimes assume that you will only want to be with someone who is blind, because they are in a similar situation to you, like you understand each other better or something.
I wouldn’t say no to a boyfriend who can drive me everywhere :d)
Thanks Jenny. There’s a term in the U.S.–from the Americans with Disabilities Act–“reasonable accommodation.” I really like that term because I think, really, that’s all everyone wants. That includes those of us who can see. And yeah, thinking that blind people would only want to be with other blind people is about like thinking the blonde people only want to be with blonde people.
Nice post. Sounds like an interesting panel. It’s hard, on both parties. People love to say things like, “Yeah, but marriage IS hard, you have to work at it!” To which I usually give a withering look and walk away. Blindness is not the end of the world, but the monkey wrenches it throws into a long-term partnership are daunting, indeed.
You know Lauren, keep up with the withering looks. I love a good withering look. People on the outside of any disability or hardship have a need to resolve the discomfort they feel when they learn about or witness the disability. So it feels good to think that a dog or a talking computer or whatever makes everything right. Or that any marriage has the kind of difficulties that we face. But it’s different, and a lot harder, as those of us who have experience marriage both ways–before and after vision loss–fully know.
So were you on the panel, too, Beth?
No, I didn’t attend. Mike said it was fine with him if I went, but I thought he might feel more comfortable talking about all this if I wasn’t there.
I must say, I think it is *very* cool that Mike agreed to be on this panel, it takes some courage to talk about these things and share personal thoughts like this with strangers.
If you ask me, this “mixed marriage” thing is a topic that isn’t discussed enough. After news gets out about the success of Mike’s panel, I hope other organizations will consider it as a session at future conferences.
Watch out, Beth. This blog by Mike is terrific! You might have some serious competition now? LOL
Keep these posts comin’ —
My late husband, Dave was always trying to protect me. When I started using a white cane, it made him so angry when people would stare at me. But the thing was, I didn’t know people were staring at me! This was an issue he had to resolve with himself.
When I was sighted he had no trouble with people staring at us. I was 14 years his junior. We were always changing our ‘look’. Once I had really long blonde hair and he had silver hair and beard ala ZZ Topp. Talk about stares!
I agree with the panel. You have to talk things out. That is one thing Dave and I did.
Andrea–I can relate to Dave’s anger. I’ve felt that way, though these days the thing that gets me crazy mad is when someone comes up and pets Hanni–without saying anything to Beth. Seems like total disrespect to me, but sometimes, I’m a little hotheaded.
Thank you Beth, and especially Mike, for sharing this. Sometimes the hardest thing can be to not try to help those we care for.
Thanks Beth and Mike for your continued efforts to educate and enlighten! Luckily before Rick lost his sight we had excellent communication skills and a deep respect for each other. After he lost his sight we found humor to be the best medicine. Last week after parking our car with the valet at a local restaurant, we exited and in a loud voice I said – “Honey, can you drive home tonight? I’m a little tired”. Then I turned to the valet and saw his white face glaring at Rick’s cane. As they say on the commercial “priceless”.
So proud to be a part of your world. You are listening and helping so many people with your personal interactions and your written words. Mike is a great “guest” blogger- would love to hear more!
Nice post, Mike.
I remember taking Beth to a hotel in Chevy Chase once when she was in town on business and we did the tour and I was worried that she would not be able to find her way after I left. But, of course, she did just fine.
And then I was thinking about the people who trail after their spouses to clean up after them…. just like I do after Keith. 🙂
So in the spirit of Mike’s blog post, Hank, I’m guessing you and Pickn finally talked about it and negotiated a deal: Pick can cook and make tinis and pop popcorn as much as he wants –guilt-free–and you can clean up after–guilt-free.
Is this how you do a smiley face?
🙂
And PS, my niece Janet, who lived with Mike and me for a few months, says now she knows the reason our marriage has lasted so long: Mike and I are both slobs!
Great smiley face, Beth. I too was interested in Mike’s spin on reasonable accommodation. Congrats to both of you. Ditto on Marilee’s comment. She expressed beautifully what I was feeling . Today I wrote my friend Roland Hudson and told him about your blog. He is anxious to talk with you and I look forward to reading your interview with him.
Thanks, Nancy — just wrote to Rollie, so stay tuned for a future blog post about him. For my other blog readers: when nancy Faust, the beloved White Sox organist retired this year, there was much made of the fac that the only time she was absent from her job was when her son Eric Was born. No news of the organist who replaced her during that time, though.
Nancy wrote me recently to let me know this: the musician who replaced her when her son Eric was born was…blind!
And so, my dear blog readers, stay tuned for a future post about Rollie, the man who took Over for nancy Faust during maternity leave.
Read all the replys and can’t think of anything that hasn’t been said, except,it’s good hearing Mikes side of the on going saga. Love your writing too mike.
Am I wrong in thinking that almost all of these “mixed” marriages did not start that way? From what I’ve read here, one of the couple lost his or her vision during the course of the marriage. That’s not exactly an intentionally “mixed” marriage.
Benita–there actually were two couples on the panel who met after one of the parties became visually impaired. The former pilot–who led the panel. The other couple met when the woman had some vision, but both parties knew the vision would degenerate over time, and it had.
I am wondering what difference it makes WHEN the spouse loses their sight? Does this imply that perhaps the sighted spouse may not have chosen their mate because of their vision loss? In my case, my husband was visually impaired when we met, and I knew given his history that if I continued in a relationship with him that at some point he would be severely visually impaired. But what difference does that make with the perceived success of any marriage? As people age, couples have to deal with one or both partners dealing with debilitating health issues. Visual impairment IS catastrophic, no argument there, but it is not life threatening. Nor does it impair your mental capabilities. Although I have to say I am always amused when someone is talking to me and my husband and they raise their voice about 30dB when talking to him!!
The psychology of dealing with a disability follows much the same course as a death in the family. Dr. Elizabeth Kubler-Ross wrote a wonderful book years ago called “On Death and Dying” where she explores the different phases a person needs to experience in dealing with death. While I have never seen anymore make parallel comments, these phases are exactly what we need to experience when a spouse develops a sight loss, catastrophic illness, etc. Married couples have to deal with difficult situations many times during the course of their relationship. Like any other challenge the better a couple can articulate their feelings to each other (including anger!) in a positive way, the more likely they will survive together.
Rhona–I’m with you–Beth and I both gained a lot when we starting considering her loss of vision much as one would the death of a loved one. You do definitely go through phases, though people tend to go through them in their own way on their own timetable. In many ways, it was the same with coming to terms with Gus’s circumstances.
The discussion about knowing what one is getting into in advance is a pretty interesting one. I’ve been asked, and have thought about this more than once, including on the panel. I think you’re exactly right–no couple will escape facing very difficult circumstances. The idea of advance knowledge about difficulty seems to really grip–and frighten–people. I tend to think that most people–if they knew what they were getting into ahead of time–wouldn’t do a whole lot. I mean, home ownership? Yikes. A job you like but ends up consuming you? Children–and no sleep?
The hardship is inescapable. It’s always a leap of faith.
Leave a Response