Another post from the sighted guide

May 1, 2011 • Posted in Beth Finke, blindness, guide dogs, Mike Knezovich, Seeing Eye dogs, Uncategorized by

Hey all–I’m sort of spent after this week–so Mike’s filling in for me on this one.

Intervention

I'm rooting for them both.

So when Beth has been in New Jersey to match up with her Seeing Eye dogs in the past, people ask me where she is. After I say, “What am I, chopped liver?”– I give them the story. And I usually say something like, “You know, really, the three weeks at The Seeing Eye is to train the people, not the dogs.” And I’m not joking.

By the time Beth parted with Hanni last November, they’d been together for ten years. And I’d been there for most of that time. And I can’t remember a single thing about what it was like when Beth and Hanni came home to Urbana. All I could remember was how well they worked  together the day before Beth headed to New Jersey. Hanni had developed an uncanny sense of Beth’s routine and our routine.

So when Harper started having problems, I literally couldn’t recall what it had been like with Hanni. I think that means Beth didn’t have any problems with her in the early months–otherwise I’d remember. Then again, Hanni had come home to Urbana–which presents its own challenges, to be sure. For one, sometimes the lack of traffic means an absence of audible cues for Beth to use to make crossing decisions. And Urbana, for all its quaintness, has–at least in our old neighborhood–horrible sidewalks. The old paving-block things are in horrible repair and pretty much impassable in spots–people routinely walk on the street instead. If you’re in a wheelchair, forget it. Drivers are erratic–students from the suburbs, just-licensed international students, farmers, parents of college students–not a good mix.

But all in all, Urbana ain’t nothin’ compared to coming home to the center of Chicago. So it’s hard to compare Harper’s performance to Hanni’s in the early months. And the important thing is, it doesn’t matter–Harper has to cut it or, eventually, cut out.

That’s not what anyone wants. Not The Seeing Eye, which spends tens of thousands of dollars breeding, raising, and training each dog. Not Beth, who’s already invested three weeks of her time in New Jersey and has worked hard to get her and Harper on the same page. And not me. I loved the guy the first time I laid eyes on him.

So The Seeing Eye sent one of their fine instructors to the rescue–we hope–last week. Nicole is a twenty-something with a presence that belies her age. She went for a walk with Beth on day one, and I sat in on the debriefing afterward. It was something of a relief to hear her thinking through what she guessed Harper was thinking when he clenched up and froze in his tracks on route. This anthropomorphizing is something Beth and I do routinely and then check ourselves. Who knows what Harper thinks? We just need him to work. But Nicole studied him–just as we had been doing–for clues.

In the end, she decided that he wants to do well so badly and wants not to screw up so badly that when it comes to decisions and ambiguity, he’d rather just fade away. Faced with ambiguity, all he sees is the opportunity to screw up. So he freezes. I wish I didn’t understand exactly what Nicole was talking about, but I did–and it made a lot of sense.

And, we learned, it doesn’t make a lick of difference unless Beth changes her behavior. The long and short of it is, Beth hadn’t been doing anything that explains Harper’s behavior. She didn’t cause these bad-dog days. But she had forgotten a lot–mostly, how to correct mistakes and to provide Harper clear cues about what was expected. After all, Beth hadn’t needed to for years.

So she and Harper are back to the basics. They’re doing really dreary things like this: At an intersection where they both know they always turn left, they still have to go to the curb as if they’re going straight. Harper needs to wait there until Beth commands “left.” She has to be the one in charge, the one deciding when and if they turn. Not Harper. So back to boot camp. It’s a total grind. But so far, it seems to be helping. And I hope that continues. Because Harper’s a really good guy, and I don’t want Beth to be gone another three weeks. Once every 10 years or so is OK, but that’s quite enough.

Lolly On May 1, 2011 at 10:03 am

Beth,

My thoughts are with you as you and Harper work through this adjustment period. It’s tough work but with persistence, patience and love, you will both get through it. Harper sounds like a sweet boy who needs a healthy dose of emotional support. As long as you have folks to fill you up with the support you need, you will be able to give him the reassureance he needs to do his best work for you.

Susie On May 1, 2011 at 11:00 am

My BEST wishes for your training efforts, Beth and Harper!
No doubt that this training grind isn’t what you’d like to be doing.
I enjoy your writing Mike. It is so cool that you and Beth are good writers! It is a treat when you share your perspective with us. Thank you!!

Mike On May 3, 2011 at 10:07 am

Thanks for the kind words, Susie, and thanks for reading. It’s fun and therapeutic.

Annelore Chapin On May 1, 2011 at 6:10 pm

Hello,

Beth, last Wednesday I say you and Harper walking briskly down Mich Ave, right after class (I was on the bus) and I can say, it was a pretty sight! Both of you appeared so sure and happy that I got all emotional. I felt like jumping out and congratulating both of you.
It must be a tough job to get to the point of total trust on both sides and I wish you success soon. Harper looks like a sweet dog. I have a blond labrador in our place in Argentina and he is super smart and loving. Anyway, all the best and yes, I enjoy your husband’s writiing too.
Annelore Chapin

bethfinke On May 5, 2011 at 7:32 am

Oh, so fun to hear of someone spotting us when we’re doing well. I sometimes fear that the only time anyone notices us is when we’re strugglig. Thanks for the encouraging words, Annelore.

Maria On May 2, 2011 at 8:39 am

Rooting for you both like Mike. No wonder you felt spent after the week you had. You were on my mind during the time the Seeing Eye trainer was in Chicago and I wondered how things were going. Mike’s post made so much sense and it is understandable why things are happening. I will continue to be a cheerleader for you both…..I’m certain it must be tiring, but keep up the good work. I feel you both will make it through this. And I also get how Mike doesn’t want you gone for three weeks….that’s understandable too!

Carl On May 2, 2011 at 8:41 am

How many days was the instructor there with Beth? So impressive that they would send someone out like that to help.

Mike On May 3, 2011 at 10:09 am

Carl–Nicole, the instructor from The Seeing Eye, worked Monday afternoon, Tuesday, and part of Wednesday with Beth. It’s a terrific organization, I can’t say enough about their professionalism, competence, and compassion.

Audrey Mitchell On May 2, 2011 at 10:58 am

I like Harper and I’m rooting for both of them too.

penn nelson On May 2, 2011 at 2:51 pm

It’s hard to put on new shoes, it takes more time to break them in than you would like, but it’s worth it in the end!

My profound thought for the day!

Penn

Colleen On May 2, 2011 at 10:51 pm

Thinking of you of both of you (and Harper!)

Mike On May 3, 2011 at 10:10 am

Thanks Colleen–I think you probably have a really good understanding of training issues:)

Lauren On May 3, 2011 at 1:45 pm

All the best, to all of you. We adopted Tom’s failed guide dog, simply because his emotional health is so fragile–we were afraid he would not be able to adjust to life with another family because he is so incredibly timid and sensitive. The indecisiveness was his fatal flaw, and he couldn’t overcome it. I hope Harper can. But even if the unthinkable happens, please believe me that everybody (including the dog) survives, and eventually thrives. Tom’s current dog is the absolutely best one yet. Not that that makes it any easier for you, but just a little weak beacon of light from the “if it goes totally sour” side. 😉 Both of you are pretty cool, as is Harper in his way. You’ll be fine, eventually. In the meantime, gooooooood thoughts. Lauren

bethfinke On May 5, 2011 at 7:24 am

Oh, Lauren, this note from you is *so* appreciated. You can’t know how much I have needed a “weak beacon of light from the “if it goes totally sour” side.”
Or then again, you are probably one of the few who can.
THANK you for providing that beacon. Even a weak one helps! .

jacques foucré On May 3, 2011 at 3:50 pm

Hi Beth and Mike and Harper,

Thinking about you and wish there was someway we could help. Maybe Anna could whip up some Polish dog treats, something with sauerkraut & horseradish combo ?, or a pierogi shaped like a doggie biscuit.
U never know…
Seriously, I hope things get better for you quickly.

bethfinke On May 5, 2011 at 7:10 am

That, or perhaps you can bring some cheese home for him from France? I am sure Harper would appreciate a nice Bleu du Vercors. Or, hmmm. Maybe a Brie de Meaux. Formidable, mon ami!

Harper is clicking right along « Safe & Sound blog On May 18, 2011 at 8:32 am

[…] lot of you have been asking about Harper’s progress after that home visit from a Seeing Eye instructor last month. How about I start with some details about that visit? The refresher course is […]

Leave a Response