Here’s a guest post from my husband Mike Knezovich:
Beth’s in two distinct minorities: She’s blind. And she’s one of the minority of people who are blind who also use guide dogs. (I’m leaving out that other ultraminority she’s in — you know, the group of people who have had a benign tumor the size of a marble on their aortic valve).
Which is all to say, she’s even more memorable to people than she would otherwise be. (And that’s saying something.) Our friends and acquaintances are justly curious about her blindness — and equally or more curious about the guide dog companions she’s had over the years. Consequently, they take special note when they see articles or TV features about other people who are blind and especially about other blind people and their guide dogs.
So, a week or so ago when the Chicago Tribune ran a story about a war veteran who’d lost his eyesight in battle and who had to retire his first guide dog, lots of folks read it, loved it, and sent it to us or told us about it. Beth did read it and said it would push every sentimental button a human could have.
I didn’t read it because, well, I don’t read most of this stuff because — not to be too flip here — I live it. I don’t need my heartstrings tugged, I know about blindness, I love Beth’s dogs and I’ve lived through three retirements. I don’t need to seek out heart-wrenching experiences. And, to be honest, the writers often sentimentalize the stories in ways that I find a little condescending and often find impossible to believe.
Well, apparently, this story about the veteran was truly unbelievable. As in totally false. Yesterday, via The Beachwood Reporter — a fabulous Web site from Steve Rhodes that keeps an eye on journalism in the Chicago area and sometimes beyond — this little link popped up on my Facebook page:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-sunday-reader-note-0728-20130728,0,1907352.story
It’s lengthy correction from the Tribune’s editors. An excerpt:
A July 21 story about a blind man and his guide dog contained major inaccuracies.
The story stated that the man was an Army veteran who lost his sight when a roadside bomb exploded. In fact, the man, John Maley, acknowledged in an interview late last week that he was not in the Army and that he lost his sight to diabetes.
Problems with the story came to light after a reader contacted the newspaper questioning the account of how Maley became blind.
The inaccurate information was provided to the Tribune by Maley, and we failed to seek corroboration for his story.
Because of that, the story contained a five-paragraph narrative of the explosion that was not true. In fact, Maley was not in the Middle East in 1991 and did not serve in the Gulf War, he said. Also, in the headline Maley is referred to as a veteran, which Maley now says is not true.
I didn’t read the story (and can’t now, because it’s no longer online), but this news left me sad and infuriated at the same time. Sad because the guy apparently needed and liked the attention so much he could tell that elaborate lie. Sad because really, I know enough to know he was worthy of a story without having been a veteran. Blindness is really really hard. Diabetes is really really hard. Working with guide dogs is both a blessing and an enormous responsibility. A good reporter and storyteller could find these stories and weave a compelling piece about the facts — and the story wouldn’t need embellishment.
The infuriated part comes from the insult he gave to veterans who did serve and were disabled during their service, and especially from the sloppy, irresponsible journalism that seems to be getting more commonplace. It ain’t the blogosphere I’m talking about — it’s places like the Tribune and the NY Times and of course, cable networks of all political bents.
One other emotion — disappointment. Whether it’s movies or television ads or social media, it seems that only extreme-to-the-point-of-freakishness items get our attention. Which numbs us to the true, quiet stories and accomplishments of people around us every day. It’s like we live in a big reality TV show. And we don’t value our own lives, which are pretty rich if we take the time to realize it.
Actual reality provides plenty of drama, heartbreak, inspiration, tragedy and comedy — can we just stick with that?
Wow. That’s awful. The Tribune! Thanks for telling us.
Perfectly said and written Mike!
Couldn’t agree more. Real life is miraculous, from one minute to the next. The endless search for sentimentalized stories seeks to cheapen the wonder of just being. Good thing it fails most of the time.
Mike, I love your writing as much as Beth’s. Thanks for sharing this, as I was one who read the original, and shared it! Now I will share yours.
You’ve articulated everything that I hate about reality TV– not that I even seek it out to watch. It’s pervasive. Well said, sir!
Brilliant, Mike — every word!
Great post, as always. I did read the piece and thought it was all very nice, except I wasn’t terribly moved–like you, I live it, dog after dog. But I was unaware of the inaccuracies, and I so agree with you. Real life–as we live it, not as television portrays it–surely renders enough human interest stories for the media. What a shame that this poor man felt he needed to enhance the very real difficulty the piece centered on.
Amen!
Well said Mike! A while back, a friend sent me an article entitled “First Person: Risking absurdity.” I love the last sentence, “My hikes haven’t landed me superhero status, but just maybe they’ve shown me the superheroness of a rich, ordinary life.” It’s a great read, http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/opinion/perspectives/first-person-risking-absurdity-656394/
Just another one of the many glorified articles our news media provide to us! Thanks Mike.
Penn Nelson
Mike,
Thank you for your response to the Tribune story, your insights. It makes one think about the many aspects of such a story and the reliability of the press. Monna
Thank you Mike for articulating the reality of ‘reality’.
I am glad to find some other people who feel that there is enough genuine ‘reality’ in life.
Thanks to Beth for having this blog and providing a way to learn and enjoy.
thank you Mike — you are a true complement to Beth.
So well said, Mike.
The real is really enough for us provided we spent a healthy life until the end. Unlike those Personal Protection Dogs who when reach the last part of their lives are thrown away from homes.
Leave a Response