Is There a Completely Reasonable Reason People Are Flying With Mini Horses? Don’t Ask Me

August 21, 2019 • Posted in blindness, guide dogs, Seeing Eye dogs, travel by

IdcardTravel everywhere you go with the help of a guide dog, and strangers will feed you an earful of stories about all the other service animals they’ve read about. Helper parrots pecking at shoppers in stores, comfort pigs going crazy on airplanes, a therapeutic rat that quells anxiety in his owner, you name it.

The New York Times published an article about miniature horses last week after The Department of Transportation (DOT) released new formal guidance regarding animals on planes that prioritizes three types of service animals for travel: cats, dogs and miniature horses. Now strangers in elevators and at street crossings are asking me about “guide ponies,” too. From the article:

Shortly after the guidelines’ release, a photo of a small ginger horse, squeezed in front of a woman’s knees, circulated on the internet. It appeared atop numerous articles, without any sort of caption, only adding to the questions raised by the travel document: If flying horses are so common, how come I’ve never rolled my carry-on past one? How could that photo be real? And even if it is, why would you ever want to squeeze a horse in front of a seat like that?”

The article shows a picture of a couple sitting in bulkhead seats of an aircraft, the leg room in front of them occupied by a pony who is standing and lodged between their kneecaps and the bulkhead wall.

After interviewing a blind woman who uses a pony as a guide, the reporter spelled out the advantages of working with a miniature pony, noting that they are:

  • mild-mannered
  • fast learners
  • known to have nearly 360-degree vision
  • able to work three times as many years as a guide dog, thanks to a longer life expectancy

I can understand that last advantage. My own Seeing Eye dog, Whitney, is nearly ten years old now and has lost the fervor she once had for her work. Mike, Whitney and I were at a White Sox game with friends the other day, and when Mike was explaining Whitney’s upcoming retirement to them, he said, “You know, she really loved working when she was young.” Our friend responded with an understanding laugh. “Hey, so did I!”

Anyway, back to this horse thing. Horses can work longer than dogs, yes, but I haven’t come across any evidence that they are better at guiding than trained guide dogs are. Ask others to accommodate a service animal who requires extra room on public transit? Expect people in neighboring seats to sit uncomfortably throughout a live performance to accommodate my pony? Take legroom away from whoever sits next to me on a plane? All of that, when for nearly 100 years now well-trained guide dogs have been doing their work in a far less obtrusive manner? Not me. Before the end of this year, I’ll be heading back to the SeeingEye to train with a new young dog.

Seeing Eye pioneers worked long and hard to open the doors and give our dogs public access. At risk of being labeled as a species-ist, I wish the DOT had limited the definition of service animals to dogs. Specifically, dogs who are public-access trained, as well as individually trained to do work or perform tasks for a person with a disability.

The description of the photo with the New York Times implies that the couple giving up their leg room is traveling together. I often fly alone with my guide Whitney, who knows not to take up my neighbor’s leg room on a plane. A 57-pound Yellow Lab/Golden Retriever cross, she was public-access trained at the Seeing Eye to sit with her bottom under the seat in front of me, and her head on my feet. On trains and buses, she sits under the bench seat. At restaurants, libraries, conferences and the like, she sits under the table.

The New York Times article reports that miniature horses stand at their owner’s feet throughout each flight. I wonder. If you are being guided by a miniature pony, Do they stand on buses, too? On trains? At movie theaters? During live performances? I have long believed that the phrase “reasonable accommodation” goes both ways. Is it reasonable to ask the person who landed that seat next to you to give up their legroom (or the entire seat, if necessary) to accommodate a pony?

The woman interviewed in the article said she “usually buys flights on short notice, calling the airline the day before to give a heads up that she will be traveling with a horse.” In the past, some airlines have told her there wouldn’t be enough room, but she is hopeful the new guidelines will discourage such behavior from here on out.

She has come up with a “tidy defecation setup” for long flights, and when she senses her miniature horse needs to go, she signals the horse to go into a deodorized bag. “I don’t want my accidents to be someone’s first impression,” she told the reporter.

The story also reports that some airport officials have asked the woman traveling for an official identification card for her miniature pony, but “unaware of any organization that offers such a thing, she and a friend eventually made a card themselves.” The New York Times article I am referring to in this post is titled “The Completely Reasonable Reason People Are Flying With Mini Horses,” but I’m not sure I get it. Exactly what “completely reasonable reason” is the reporter talking about?

A version of this blog post was published yesterday on the Easterseals National blog.

John Craib-cox On August 21, 2019 at 7:19 am

Elephants are supposed to be smart. How wou0ld they work as comfort animals to travel with?

Beth On August 21, 2019 at 9:32 am

Oh, John. Don’t give anybody any ideas…!

Doug Finke On August 21, 2019 at 10:31 am

Ugh!!

Sheila A. Donovan On August 21, 2019 at 11:42 am

The service animal farce continues. It’s enraging!

iliana On August 21, 2019 at 12:54 pm

“a therapeutic rat that quells anxiety in his owner” … while causing anxiety in the near by folks?!
When I accepted a job offer in the UK some 10 years ago, I was entertained to read my salary came with pet-insurance covering cats, dogs, birds, pigs and horses, but no snakes and no fish. But why?! Got it, no across-Atlantic wish-granting golden fish allowed! Pet is a one thing, you could keep them home, in your neighborhood perhaps, I don’t know…but service animals who accompany you everywhere (sauna!) ? I agree with Beth that horses — be it pony or miniature Budweiser Clydesdales — do not belong everywhere. I won’t mind a cat though, because they are purrrfect. And don’t start me on the emotional support animals…by the time I express my opinion I’d need one myself. Great post, Beth!

Beth On August 21, 2019 at 8:56 pm

I agree, Iliana! more than once has an emotional support dog yipped and tried to snap at Whitney, made me think my dog could use an emotional support animal of her own. If cats really are purrrrrfect, maybe she’d do well with a feline.

B On August 21, 2019 at 10:10 pm

when I first heard about guide horses it was for a Muslim young woman whose parents wouldn’t let her have a dog in the house (the horse could stay outside). I’ve also seen some who were allergic to dogs happy to still have the option of a guide horse, so there are cases where it makes sense.

Beth On August 21, 2019 at 10:22 pm

Now, those are two examples of reasonable reasons. Wish the NY Times reporter would have mentioned these examples in her story. Then the title would have made some sense. Thank you for leaving this comment, very helpful.

Annelore On August 30, 2019 at 9:10 pm

I would like to believe that the NY Times reporter was being sarcastic! This is almost surreal.

Beth On August 30, 2019 at 9:28 pm

When I was in journalism school (back before the micro-chip) we learned that page editors often choose the headline for articles published in a newspaper. Back then you had to count (andif I am remembering correctly, measure?) the headlines to make sure they would fit well in the space provided. Anyway, after I read this NYTimes article I thought Much like you do, Annelore. Perhaps the person who wrote the headline wasn’t the same person who wrote the article? An attempt at sarcasm?

Leave a Response